Previous Audit Provisions | New Provisions |
All non-dormant companies that either had a corporate shareholder, had more than 20 shareholders or its Annual Revenue > SGD 5M required an audit. | All Private companies that meets the definition of “Small Company “and are part of “Small Group” in each of immediate past 2 financial year are exempt from audit. |
If not part of a group (small company) | |
Criteria: – Revenue < SGD 10M – Assets < SGD 10M – Employees < 50 |
Must satisfy any 2 out of the following 3 conditions for the past 2 years. |
If part of a group (small company) | |
The company itself must be a small company (as per above points) | Entire group must be a “small group” on consolidated basis |
Entire group satisfy any 2 out of the 3 criterias for past 2 years. |
Transitional Provisions for existing companies
Illustration
Assumption:
a) The company is a private company throughout the period
b) The company’s FY.2015 commences on or after the 1st of July 2015
Two scenarios to illustrate transitional provisions
Scenario 1 | FY 2015 | FY 2016 | FY 2017 | FY 2018 | FY 2019 | FY 2020 |
Meets Quantitative Criteria | Yes | No | `Yes | No | No | Yes |
Qualifies as a “Small Company” | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
Remarks | FY 2015 is the first financial year after the commencement of the “small company” criteria, the company qualifies as a small company. | As the company already qualified as “small company” in FY 2015, it continues to be a “small company” despite not meeting the quantitative criteria in FY 2016. It will only be disqualified when it fails to meet the criteria for 2 consecutive financial years preceding FY 2016 | The company already qualified as a small company in FY 2015 and it is not disqualified. | As the company already qualified as a “small company” in FY 2015, it continues to be a “small company” despite not meeting the criteria in current FY and for one of the two preceding FYs | Although the company meets the criteria in Current FY but not in the preceding 2 FY’s, hence it is disqualified. |
Two scenarios to illustrate transitional provisions
Scenario 2 | FY 2015 | FY 2016 | FY 2017 | FY 2018 | FY 2019 | FY 2020 |
Meets Quantitativ e Criteria | No | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes |
Qualifies as a “Small Company” | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
Remarks | FY 2015 is the first financial year after the commencement of the “small company” criteria, the company does not qualify as a small company as it does not meet the quantitative criteria in FY 2015. | FY 2016 is the second FY after the commencement of the “small company” criteria, the company qualifies as a small company as it is a private company and meets the quantitative criteria. In FY 2016. | The company already qualified as a small company in FY 2016 and it is not disqualified. | As the company already qualified as a “small company” in FY 2016, it continues to be a “small company” despite not meeting the quantitative criteria in current FY and for one of the two preceding FYs | Although the company meets the quantitative criteria in Current FY, it is disqualified as it fails to meet the quantitative criteria for two consecutive financial years preceding FY 2020. |